Sunday, February 15, 2015

RSA #3: Resource-Based Learning

Peer Reviewed Article Online Links:

Other Online Links:
Online Link #3: http://www.slideshare.net/bsed3a/edtech-lesson-8-group-3-bsed-3a


According to Campbell, Flageolle, Griffith and Wojcik (2014), resource-based learning (RBL) engages students through the use of a variety of resources, in an active way.  Students can use pre-selected print or non-print materials by the teacher and Media Specialist as resources throughout this learning process that are compatible with their own learning preferences and processing skills.  Media specialists and teacher collaborate before, throughout, and after the unit to provide a rich RBL experience for the students.  The goal of RBL is to create autonomous learners who can find information effectively and be self-directed learners.  Although teachers plan the instruction, student direct have the opportunity to choose how they learn.  Teachers are guides/facilitators that collaborate with the Media Specialist to incorporate supporting materials and relevant technologies appropriate for the RBL unit.  Teacher are to ask questions to guide students to the answers to meet learning goals.  The final product of RBL is a student-created artifact that is presented at the completion of the unit.  The benefits of RBL exceedingly outweigh the challenges it brings (see Table 1).  Benefits of RBL include; students’ literacy skills are enhanced, lifelong learners are created, student’s become efficient with resources, the final projects increase student motivation to find quality resources, the students are motivated to learn through choice of resources selected, problem solving skills and higher-order thinking skills are developed, and students interact with resources instead of getting information told to them.  Some challenges include time and effort spent collaborating with other staff (teachers and Media Specialists), ability and accuracy assess learning goals, and unforeseen technology issues (Campbell et al., 2014).


Table 1
Benefits and Challenges of RBL
Benefits (student gains)
Challenges
Enhanced literacy skills
Collaboration (time, effort)
Life-long learners
Assess learning goals
Efficiency with resources
Technology issues
Student motivation from project and choice of resources.

Problem-solving skills

Higher-order thinking skills

Interaction with resources


When implementing RBL, keep in mind the nine steps Resource-Based Learning suggests (2014).  It is important to first identify the goals for the unit, then determine the artifacts the students are able to produce.  The Media Specialist and teacher collaborate to plan the unit, choose the resources, determine the timeline and schedule, and create the rubric.  At the completion of the unit, the teacher and media specialist evaluate the artifacts and evaluate the unit as a whole to determine what was successful and what adjustments can be made to improve the unit (Campbell et al., 2014) (see Table 2).   


Table 2
Implementing Resource-Based Learning Cheat Sheet

Step
Implementing Resource-Based Learning Cheat Sheet
1
Identify the goals for the unit.
2
Determine artifacts students can produce.
3
Collaborate (Media Specialist and teacher) to plan.
4
Choose resources for students.
5
Determine timeline for the unit.
6
Schedule - reserve space for researching, computer lab, and any other events/presenters.
7
Create rubrics.
8
Evaluate student artifacts.
9
Evaluate unit through collaboration - revise if necessary.


According to Greenhow, Dexter and Riedel, “Automated evaluation tools and data collection methods can help such Web site designers develop and use online, resource-based learning environments to meet their goals of providing high quality learning opportunities for teachers” (2006, p. 21).  This article discusses the importance of developing quality learning environments when using them for RBL environments.  The literature allows teachers to use criteria to determine whether the website is worth using in a RBL environment.  A checklist is provided to help teachers determine if a particular web-based learning environment is appropriate and beneficial to the students.  The four features within this checklist include Knowledge-centered, Community-centered, Assessment-centered, and Learner-centered.  Knowledge-centered features include hyper-links to resources, networking forums, and interactive tools.  Community-centered features include chat rooms, bulletin boards, human facilitators for discussions, and student work examples.  Assessment-centered features include reflections, feedback forms, and questions.  Learner-centered features include learning styles that are diverse, databases where students can search, and ability to attach files within a digital workspace.  If a particular learning environment website does not include all aspects on the checklist, it doesn’t necessarily mean the resource is not appropriate, but it is a good guideline to follow based on the needs and preferences of the resource.  If website designers understand the teachers needs, keeping the checklist in mind, better learning environments will be created for a better learning experience for students (Greenhow, Dexter & Riedel, 2006).  


The Edtech Lesson 8 video does a great job of explaining the difference of traditional learning and RBL on slide 7.  On the left side it indicates that in the traditional learning model, the teacher is the expert, textbooks are the primary source for the content, specific facts are learned, the end product is the end of the learning for that unit, and there is a quantitative assessment in the end.  Under the resourced-based learning side, it indicates that teachers are the facilitators, there are a variety of sources to gather information, students learn by discovering information, the process of learning is learned aside from just the content, and at the end of the unit there are qualitative and quantitative assessments (see Figure 1) (bsed3a, 2015).


 
Figure 1.  Traditional vs. resource-based learning.


Some students have a difficult time with RBL and “suffer from cognitive overload and conceptual and navigational disorientation” (Tergan, Gräber & Neumann, 2006, p. 327).  According to Tergan, Gräber and Neumann (2006).  Research indicates concepts maps help students cope with the more complex problems, and can support the organization of knowledge when using RBL.  Many students do not have the experience with RBL and therefore, lack the strategies needed to be successful with RBL.  Visual-spatial strategies help with complex subject matter, increasing the intellectual performance of the student.  When using RBL, visual-spatial strategies are important to consider to enhance the student’s learning experience (Tergan, Gräber & Neumann, 2006).  


The Resource-Based Instruction Enters the 21st Century: Creating a New Curriculum (1995) discusses ten concepts to assist teachers when implementing RBL lesson units.  The ten concepts are used to move the students from the old resource style, to the new ever-changing technology based world.  The Ten concepts include: “a shared pool of materials benefits everyone, library materials are arranged by subject, reference materials are available for all students, recognition of the arrangement of a resource speeds access to its information, indexes are the major key to locating information rapidly, not all information is equal, timeliness of information is an important consideration, information may carry bias, research requires both thinking and communicating, voluntary reading builds knowledge” (Weisburg & Toor, 1995, p. 10).  RBL is the “most effective way to prepare lifelong learners” (Weisburg & Toor, 1995, p. 8) and contains five elements including; a “variety of resources, collaborative planning and teaching, resources are used for a purpose, group work, diverse and a shared end product” (Weisburg & Toor, 1995, p. 8-9).  The technology advances change the approach of the Information Curriculum because the number of types of sources have increased requiring two questions to guide students; what do you want the students to be able to do, and what do you want them to understand? RBL does not require one correct answer and in some cases the answers might not be 100% accurate, but the students should be using critical thinking skills to get to the answers they indicate.  Information sheets are used in RBL to guide the students to find the information needed.  Fill in the blank questions are not used, instead, open-ended questions are asked to drive students to create reasoned judgements (Weisburg & Toor, 1995).


The five summarized resources indicated have commonalities amongst them regarding RBL and all support one another.  Campbell, Flageolle, Griffith and Wojcik (2014) give a great description of what RBL is and an excellent example of how it is used within the classroom.  It paints a clear picture of what a RBL unit looks like from start to finish (Campbell, Flageolle, Griffith & Wojcik, 2014).  Weisburg and Toor (1995) go into detail and have similar suggestions on how to use RBL within the classroom, but the ten concepts are worded slightly different.  The additional information on information sheets is helpful for new RBL teachers trying to implement a RBL lesson (Weisburg & Toor, 1995).  The other three resources branch off from what RBL is and discusses different concepts within RBL.  Edtech Lesson 8 (2015) does a nice job determining the advantages of RBL versus traditional learning, supporting the benefits of RBL.  When teachers are looking to implement an RBL lesson, it is important to keep in mind how to evaluate the web-based resources being used with the lesson.  The four features within this checklist (knowledge-centered, community-centered, assessment-centered, and learner-centered) are important considerations when searching for quality resources for the students (Greenhow, Dexter & Riedel, 2006).  With the amount of resources selected, the chance of students to get overwhelmed by materials is very likely.  Concept maps or visual-spatial strategies are important aids for students to gather their information and make sense of the information and knowledge they are ingesting (Tergan, Gräber & Neumann, 2006).  All five resources are linked and support each other throughout the research.  


A RBL lesson can be used within the 8th grade health classroom for the disease unit.  Table 3 is the cheat sheet created from Resource-Based Learning (2014).  In the right-hand column are descriptions on how the particular step is met.  The goal of the unit would be to identify and communicate with others within their school, family, and community regarding health issues.  The students are to choose the disease and artifact to create to convey the information.  The students would be asked “why is (insert disease here) a health concern?”.  The question is an open-ended question forcing the students to find information on the concern.  Since I have not collaborated with a Media Specialist on this unit, parts of this table can still be added including the artifacts and resources chosen.  The Media Specialist would have additional suggestions for those.  The unit would be ten days long and macbooks would need to be reserved.  A doctor would be an appropriate presenter for this particular unit because a doctor would cover a majority of health issues.  Once the artifacts are created, the artifacts would be evaluated using the rubrics, and finally, the unit would be evaluated overall by the teacher and media specialist.  Information sheets can be used to guide the learners (Weisburg & Toor, 1995).  Concept maps can be used for students to gather their thoughts and organize their knowledge (Tergan, Gräber & Neumann, 2006).


Table 3
Example of RBL in Health Using the RBL Cheat Sheet

Step
Implementing Resource-Based Learning Cheat Sheet
EXAMPLE -
DISEASE RBL UNIT
1
Identify the goals for the unit.
"The students will be able to identify and communicate with others within their school, family, and community regarding health issues".
2
Determine artifacts students can produce.
Powerpoint presentation, public service announcement, fact sheet, podcast, etc.
3
Collaborate (Media Specialist and teacher) to plan.
Determine if other types of resources are available (books, videos, interactive websites, etc.)
4
Choose resources for students.
Mayoclinic.org, cdc.gov, niddk.nih.gov, kidshealth.org
5
Determine timeline for the unit.
10 DAY UNIT: 3 days to research, 3 days to create artifact, 1 day for presenter, 3 days to present artifacts.
6
Schedule - reserve space for researching, computer lab, and any other events/presenters.
Reserve macbooks for 6 days, bring in presenter (doctor), reserve library for presentation days for space allotment.
7
Create rubrics.
Create rubric used for artifacts.
8
Evaluate student artifacts.
Assess the artifacts using the rubric.
9
Evaluate unit through collaboration - revise if necessary.
Meet with Media Specialist to review unit and make changes if necessary.


References

bsed3a.  (2015).  Edtech lesson 8 (group 3 bsed 3a) [Video file].  Slideshare.  Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/bsed3a/edtech-lesson-8-group-3-bsed-3a
Campbell, L., Flageolle, P., Griffith, S. & Wojcik, C. (2014).  Resource-based learning. Retrieved from http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/index.php?title=Resource-Based_Learning
Greenhow, C., Dexter, S. & Riedel, E. (2006).  Methods for evaluating online, resource-based learning environments for teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 23(1), 21-28.  Week5-reading_resource-based-learning_v15.pdf
Illinois State Board of Education. (2015).  Illinois State State goal 22: understand principles of health promotion and the prevention and treatment of illness and injury.  Illinois State Board of Education.  Retrieved from http://www.isbe.net/ils/pdh/pdf/goal22.pdf
Tergan, S.O., Gräber, W. & Neumann, A. (2006).  Mapping and managing knowledge and information in resource-based learning.  Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(4), 327-336.  Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.cucproxy.cuchicago.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=1b0f0ac3-abef-4d00-bee1-456be0704219%40sessionmgr4005&hid=4114
Weisburg, H. & Toor, R.  (1995).  Resource-based instruction enters the 21st century: creating a new curriculum.  Emergency Librarian, 23(2), 8-10.  Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.cucproxy.cuchicago.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=34&sid=34218531-c43a-4967-b934-b7fe0454fe07%40sessionmgr4004&hid=4104&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWNvb2tpZSxpcCxjcGlkJmN1c3RpZD1zODQxOTIzOSZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmU%3d#db=eric&AN=EJ514996

Sunday, February 8, 2015

RSA #2 - Project-Based Learning


Online Link: http://www.teachthought.com/learning/project-based-learning/13-timeless-project-based-learning-resources/ 

Online Link: http://content.ebscohost.com.cucproxy.cuchicago.edu/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=47390405&S=R&D=a9h&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeprU4xNvgOLCmr02eqK5Srq64SLaWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGuskm3qLFRuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA 

Online Link: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ980187.pdf


“Studies have shown that students who use project-based learning remember the material much longer and have healthier attitudes toward education” (Dauphin, 2013).  Project-based learning begins with a real world problem and students are to find a solution using collaboration, communication (Dauphin, 2013), and critical thinking skills (Buck Institute for Education, 2010).  Teachers act as facilitators, not lecturers.  There are many resources to aid teachers in implementing project-based learning in their classrooms including Edutopia, GlobalSchoolNet.org, and ThinkQuest.org (Dauphin, 2013).  The traditional way of schooling used to be boring, sitting in class memorizing facts.  Project-based learning allows students to take problems and solve them, something that is needed and desired in the real world.  The path of project-based learning deepens the knowledge of the content, providing a better retention of materials.  Project-based learning creates fun when learning.  Figure 1 is a screen shot of the Project Based Learning Explained video.  This images shows illustrations of critical thinking, collaboration, and communication, all three skills that are utilized when using project-based learning (Buck Institute for Education, 2010). 










Figure 1.  Critical thinking, collaboration, and communication.

Project-based learning has been researched and tentatively supported that project-based learning using technology is advantageous when learning history content, but future research is still suggested.  Hernandez-Ramos and De La Paz took two eighth grade history classrooms and taught about 19th century U.S. history (2009).  Each condition completed a 6-week unit with equal number of lessons to teach all the content.  The state standards played a large role in this study acting as a guide for the instruction.   One class was taught using the traditional form of instruction whereas the other class was taught using project-based learning using technology.  The students who received the project-based learning using technology approach showed significant gains compared to the more traditional form of instruction.  There was also an increase in the ability to understand history versus just knowing facts, showing an improvement in thinking skills.  “Regular opportunities to work with technology in PBL are more likely to result in sustained improvements in student achievement and lead to an even deeper understanding and appreciation of history” (Hernandez-Ramos and De La Paz, 2009).

Systemwide Implementation of Project-Based Learning discusses the benefits of project-based learning used within the out-of-school time (OST) programs managed by the Public Health Management Corporation (PHMC) (Schwalm and Tylek, 2012).  1,700 projects have been completed since 2009 and all the projects now share a similar methodology.  PHMC specialists have noticed that project-based learning “have noted improvements in key areas of program quality as defined in local and national frameworks” (Schwalm and Tylek, 2012). There currently is no research on the use of project-based learning in OST systemwide programs, although there is evidence that implementing PBL has “a positive impact on the quality and rigor of program activities” (2012). Philadelphia uses project-based learning in a systemwide approach. Schwalm and Tylek believe PBL presents students with real-world, multidisciplinary problems that demand critical thinking, engagement, and collaboration” (2012).  PHMC is currently in the process of analyzing whether PLB learning is impacting student’s ability to collaborate and have confidence in their learning abilities.  The data already collected indicates gains in those areas. 

These articles show commonalities in reference to project-based learning.  Each of the resources uses common language when referring to the definition and student skills gained from project-based learning.  The module readings discussed what project-based learning is, whereas Schwalm and Tylek discussed the definition as well as the benefit of using technology within project-based learning (2012).  Technology is not a requirement of project-based learning, although it does enhance the experience for the students allowing for more collaboration amongst students (Hernandez-Ramos and De La Paz, 2009).  There is a lot of research on project-based learning, although, there is not a lot of research on systemwide implementation of project-based learning in out-of-school time programs used within the Public Health Management Corporation.  Research is in progress with this system, but the little data that has been collected indicates project-based learning is successful in PHMC’s systemwide OTS program.  All four resources built on each other and provided more detailed information regarding project-based learning.

The project-based learning approach can be used within the health classroom in multiple ways.  Within the anti-violence unit, the students currently create a presentation with assigned questions to address.  Problem-based learning can enhance the learning experience for this unit by having the students create a public service announcement to address the dangers and concerns of their particular type of violence.  The teacher will indicate each student is a member on the anti-bullying committee.  The committee has been asked to create awareness about bullying.  Each team is to design a project to raise awareness about bullying to lower the number of incidents of bullying in middle school.  The administrators will vote and select only one project to display at the September assembly the following school year.  The teacher will provide websites and resources for the students to get started, but the students are responsible for finding the information they would like to address.  The students would have to address this question using technology outlets such as a public service announcement (video or podcast), webpage, formal letter, etc. Students, in groups of three or four, will have to collaborate on the assignment and communicate with their team on their decisions regarding the assignment and rubric.  The students have choice within the project, but the content of the project is still consistent (Dauphin, 2013). 
           
References

Buck Institute for Education. (2010, December 9).  Project based learning: explained.  [Video file].  Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMCZvGesRz8

Dauphin, S.  (2013).  12 timeless project-based learning resources.  Retrieved from:  http://www.teachthought.com/learning/project-based-learning/13-timeless-project-based-learning-resources/

Hernandez-Ramos, P. & De La Paz, S.  (2009).  Learning history in middle school by designing multimedia in a project-based learning experience.  Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 151-173.  Retrieved from http://content.ebscohost.com.cucproxy.cuchicago.edu/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=47390405&S=R&D=a9h&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeprU4xNvgOLCmr02eqK5Srq64SLaWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGuskm3qLFRuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA


Schwalm, J. & Tylek, K.S.  (2012). Systemwide implementation of project-based learning: the Philadelphia approach.  Afterschool Matters, 2.  Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ980187.pdf